Sir Jim Ratcliffes spokesperson told The Times: If the club is for sale, Jim is definitely a potential buyer.
"There is a lot of interest, especially in the US, in investing in Premier League clubs. They think they can get a good deal at the moment and that the value of Premier League clubs is going to boom in the next few years because they believe there will be a lot more interest in streaming and they can make money from the fans these Premier League clubs have all around the world. They sold that stake to shareholders - this time it's about bringing in an investor." He's always said he's potentially interested in buying United if they were put up for sale and that has now been confirmed." "He has made no secret of his desire to own a Premier League club. "This is not about the money that has been spent or not spent.
The British Billionaire hopes to finally get his hand on a Premier League club after he failed in a late bid for Chelsea.
Although the conditions are different to what was on offer in SW6 after the Roman Abramovich sanctioning, it is understood that Ratcliffe is very keen to throw his hat in the ring early doors alongside different consortiums and [bidders like Elon Musk.](https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-united-elon-musk-glazers-24776278) [The Times,](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i-want-to-buy-manchester-united-says-jim-ratcliffe-bjqk2bfrx) a spokesman for the Ineos owner confirmed that Ratcliffe would be open to beginning talks with the United owners. Will it be second time lucky for the British Billionaire who has a [ net worth of around £6.3billion?](https://www.football.london/chelsea-fc/news/who-is-jim-ratcliffe-chelsea-23828058) His inability to enter proceedings early with the Chelsea takeover played against his 'British' bid which bypassed the Raine Group process and therefore wasn't really considered by the higher-ups in West London who used the New York Investment bank to conduct proceedings. Fast forward all these months and that perception has now changed. [the Independent,](https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/man-utd-sale-news-glazers-b2146837.html) the Glazers are at least looking to sell a minority stake in the club with the view of being bought out in the long-term future.
Hopes of a potential takeover were raised on Wednesday as it was revealed the Glazer family were open to selling a minority stake in the club. It remains to be ...
He has previously described United as being in a “catastrophic” situation. And having previously talked down the idea of buying the club, a spokesperson for Britain’s richest man has confirmed he would now be interested. It remains to be seen whether they will be open to selling United, but Ratcliffe is one of the few people who could genuinely finance a takeover.
On Wednesday, a spokesperson speaking on behalf of the billionaire Ineos owner, outlined that the English businessman views himself as a 'potential buyer' ...
People who live in Monaco for at least 183 days a year do not pay any income or property taxes. Sir Jim is a lifelong Manchester United fan, although he also has a season ticket at Chelsea. They have lost the plot.' They have been the dumb money, which you see with players like Fred. 'We have a different approach here to be moderately intelligent about it. United have done it really poorly. [The current ownership model at the club sees the majority of control lie with the Glazer family, with Avram and Joel Glazer the main representatives.](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ineoss-billionaire-owner-sir-jim-ratcliffe-i-want-to-buy-manchester-united-bjqk2bfrx) In 2020, he was slammed for following a raft of rich Britons including Topshop boss Phillip Green and his wife Tina in relocating from the UK to Monaco where he is expected to save an estimated £4billion in tax. Brothers Avram (right) and Joel Glazer (left) are expected to keep their shares in the Red Devils A self-confessed Manchester United fan, Ratcliffe has the aim of going further and eventually taking full control of the club in the future - after seeing his last-minute £4.25billion offer to purchase [the Times](https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/sir-jim-ratcliffe-buy-a-premier-league-club-for-billions-ill-never-be-the-dumb-money-8ts7k5mz3) in 2019: '[Ineos] never wants to be the dumb money in town, never. [revealed](/sport/sportsnews/article-11120181/The-Glazer-family-open-selling-minority-stake-Manchester-United.html) the club's current American owners, the Glazer family, were considering selling a minority stake in Man United and that they had held preliminary discussions about the possibility of bringing in a new investor.
Musk, the world's richest person, said on Tuesday night on Twitter that he wanted to buy England's most successful club before clarifying that it was a joke ...
RECOMMENDED United's net debt had grown 11% to about 496 million pounds ($598 million) by the end of March. It is unclear if the interest would result in any deals. The Times first reported Ratcliffe's interest on Wednesday. Bloomberg reported they would consider selling a minority stake, opening the door for Ratcliffe.
United fan Ratcliffe failed with a late bid for Premier League rivals Chelsea in May, losing out to US businessman Todd Boehly's consortium.
I'm not buying any sports teams." Last Updated: 18th August 2022 12:38 PM Published: 18th August 2022 12:38 PM
Who is potential Man Utd buyer Sir Jim Ratcliffe, how much is he worth, why would he ...
A statement read: “This is not about the money that has been spent or not spent. Ratcliffe has also dipped his toes into the worlds of other sports, too. That has set the pulses racing among Man Utd fans who are hugely frustrated with the Glazer family ownership and the way they handle business. If something like this was possible, we would be interested in talking with a view to long-term ownership." If a bid is to be accepted in the long-run, it's estimated that Ratcliffe may need to stump up as much as £5bn. Sir Jim Ratcliffe made the headlines in April when he launched a late bid to buy Chelsea for £4bn, and now it appears he has his sights set on Manchester United.
British billionaire Jim Ratcliffe expressed interest in buying Manchester United on Tuesday -- if the club is for sale.
"While supporters have called for a change, of course this has to be right change. The Manchester United Supporters Trust has released a statement addressing the rumors about a potential change of ownership saying, "Speculation is mounting about a potential change of ownership or new investors at the Manchester United. CNN has reached out the Glazer family and Manchester United and has not received confirmation that the club is for sale.
MARTIN SAMUEL: Elon Musk's takeover wasn't even the biggest joke at Manchester United's expense this week. The richest man on the planet was only teasing in ...
Further fan protests against the Glazers are planned for Monday night’s game with Liverpool, and there is already a movement against Apollo, who are seen to be Glazer allies rather than their replacements. As a minority investor the best that could be hoped is that they applied pressure to the club’s executive management. The Ratcliffe camp say their man is a buyer but only if the club is for sale, which it isn’t. Much as when Musk tweeted, there was great excitement when the wealthiest man in Britain seemed to suggest he would be interested in a stake in United. Yet, and here is the key, Joel and Avram Glazer wish to keep the majority stake and control the day to day running of the club. The Premier League would therefore have to look at his involvement very closely. The richest man on the planet was only teasing when he pretended to be buying the club in a tersely enticing tweet, and that was bad enough. A suggested five-year contract would make United hostages to fortune given his age and while it could be argued he would justify his wage and fee as a premium talent, so was Raphael Varane when he left Real, and United appear to have worked their post-Ferguson magic on him. So why would Sir Jim Ratcliffe want to get involved with the club in its present state? He’s a much better player, but unless he’s got the worst negotiator in football, surely he earns more than Rabiot? The new boss will be the same as the old boss. ‘You are not energised in the same way you were before.