Gyanvapi

Varanasi Court is going to announce decision on the maintainability of the Gyanvapi Mosque case on Monday. Know the full timeline of the case here.

ज्ञानवापी परिसर स्थित श्रृंगार गौरी के नियमित दर्शन-पूजन के मामले पर सोमवार को फैसला ...

[India News](https://www.amarujala.com/india-news) in Hindi related to live update of politics, sports, entertainment, technology and education etc. Stay updated with us for all breaking news from India News and more [news in Hindi](https://www.amarujala.com/). [Hindi News App](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.org.AmarUjala.news), iOS [Hindi News App](https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/amar-ujala-hindi-news/id1028364855) और [Amarujala Hindi News APP](https://www.amarujala.com/amar-ujala-app-download?utm_source=storypromo&utm_campaign=Storyappdownload) अपने मोबाइल पे

Gyanvapi Case Live Update: ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी केस सुनवाई योग्य है या नहीं, इस पर आज वाराणसी ...

जिला अदालत वाराणसी के कंप्यूटर में ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी विवाद 15वें नंबर पर फीड किया गया है. ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी विवाद में पोषणीयता के मामले में वाराणसी के जिला जज ए.के. सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश पर जिला जज वाराणसी की अदालत में मामले की पोषणीयता पर सुनवाई हो रही थी. अजय कृष्ण विश्वेश की अदालत में ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी मुकदमे की पोषणीयता यानी मुकदमा चलने योग्य है या नहीं, इसको लेकर आज अहम फैसला आएगा. ज्ञानवापी-श्रृंगार गौरी केस में करीब तीन महीने से ज्यादा चली सुनवाई के बाद आज कोर्ट का फैसला आएगा. 21 दिन की सुनवाई के बाद बीते 24 अगस्त को इस मामले में जिला जज वाराणसी ए.के. सिविल के अभी तक के मामलों में पोषणीयता पर हुई सुनवाई में सबसे लंबी सुनवाई हुई है. ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी केस सुनवाई योग्य है या नहीं, इस पर आज वाराणसी जिला जज की अदालत अपना फैसला सुना दिया है. Gyanvapi Case Live Update: ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी केस की सुनवाई के दौरान जिला जज की अदालत ने बड़ा फैसला सुनाया है. ज्ञानवापी मामले पर वाराणसी जिला अदालत ने मुस्लिम पक्ष की अर्जी को खारिज कर दिया है. हिंदू पक्ष की याचिकाकर्ता मंजू व्यास ने मीडिया से बात करते हुए कहा कि अदालत के फैसले से संपूर्ण देश खुश है. जज साहब ने फैसला 1991 के संसद के कानून को दरकिनार कर दिया है.

काशी विश्वनाथ मंदिर-ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद मामले में इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट में सुनवाई पूरी हो ...

मुस्लिम पक्ष की याचिका पर फैसला आएगा, जिसमें मुस्लिम पक्ष ने कहा था कि ज्ञानवापी का वाद (मुकदमा) 1991 के पूजा स्थल विधेयक का उल्लंघन है. ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद और श्रृंगार गौरी मामले (Gyanvapi and Shringar Gauri Case) में वाराणसी जिला अदालत आज (12 सितंबर) अपना फैसला सुनाएगी. जबकि, हिंदू पक्ष ने कहा कि ज्ञानवापी का मुकदमा 1991 के पूजा स्थल विधेयक कानून का उल्लंघन नहीं है, पहले धार्मिक स्वरूप तय हो तब पता चलेगा कि पूजा स्थल विधेयक इस पर लागू होता है या नहीं. ज्ञानवापी केस में फैसले से पहले वाराणसी कोर्ट परिसर में सुरक्षा के कड़े इंतजाम किए गए हैं और इस वक्त 250 से अधिक पुलिसकर्मियों को तैनात किया गया है. ज्ञानवापी मामले पर वाराणसी जिला अदालत ने अपना फैसला सुना दिया है. वाराणसी में सुरक्षा के कड़े इंतजाम (High Alert in Varanasi) किए गए है. उत्तर प्रदेश में गैर सरकारी मदरसों के सर्वे के लिए टीम का गठन कर दिया गया है. वाराणसी में एडिशनल पुलिस कमिश्नर संतोष के सिंह ने कहा कि सुरक्षा के इंतजाम पुख्ता हैं. ज्ञानवापी मामले पर फैसला आने के बाद याचिकाकर्ता सोहन लाल आर्य ने कहा कि यह हिंदू समुदाय की जीत है. वाराणसी जिला अदालत ने मुस्लिम पक्ष की अर्जी को खारिज कर दिया है. बीजेपी ने कहा कि परिवार के इशारे पर संघ का अपमान हुआ. ज्ञानवापी मामले पर उत्तर प्रदेश के डिप्टी CM ब्रजेश पाठक ने कहा कि हम माननीय न्यायालय के निर्णय का सम्मान करते हैं.

Gyanvapi mosque case: The Muslim side is set to move the Allahabad High Court. | Latest News India.

[alert was sounded in sensitive areas of the state](https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/lucknow-news/security-beefed-up-in-varanasi-day-ahead-of-ruling-in-gyanvapi-mosque-case-101662908441627.html) ahead of the ruling. [Latest India News](https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news)along with [Latest News](https://www.hindustantimes.com/latest-news)and [Top Headlines](https://www.hindustantimes.com/)from India and around the world. It's a foundation stone for the Gyanvapi temple," Sohan Lal Arya, another petitioner, said. "Peace being ensured. The Muslim side is now set to move the Allahabad High Court. Gyanvapi mosque case: The Muslim side is set to move the Allahabad High Court.

Five women, in their plea in April, said that they have the right to worship Maa Shringar Gauri on the outer wall of Gyanvapi Mosque, near the Kashi ...

The report of the filming was submitted to the court in a sealed cover. In April, the Varanasi civil court ordered the filming of the Gyanvapi mosque based on the petition by the Hindu women. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. They claimed that there were idols of Hindu gods and goddesses in the Mosque complex. In their plea, the women said they have the right to worship Maa Shringar Gauri on the outer wall of Gyanvapi Mosque, near the Kashi Vishwanath Temple.

The Varanasi District Court on Monday rejected the petition of the Muslim side in the Gyanvapi Masjid case.

Whatever Supreme Court said regarding Place of Worship in the Babri Masjid case we were hopeful that all issues related to temples and mosques would be resolved, "Maulana Khalid Rashid Farangi Mahli, Member, All India Muslim Personal Law Board, told India Today. More than 250 policemen were deployed outside the Varanasi court complex. The next hearing of the case is on Sep 22," advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side, said. It's a foundation stone for the Gyanvapi temple. The court has posted the matter for hearing on September 22 and it will now hear the arguments based on merits. Five women had filed a petition seeking permission for daily worship of Hindu deities whose idols are claimed to be located on an outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque.

प्रयागराज, जेएनएन। Gyanvapi Masjid Varanasi Case: इलाहाबाद हाई कोर्ट (Allahabad High Court) में काशी विश्वनाथ ...

Gyanvapi News Update: ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद मामले में वाराणसी कोर्ट के फैसले के बाद अब मुस्लिम पक्ष ...

Varanasi Court Virdict on Gyanvapi ज्ञानवापी मामले में जिला अदालत ने हिन्दू पक्ष के हक में फैसला दिया ...

हिंदू पक्ष की याचिकाकर्ता मंजू व्यास ने कहा- "भारत आज खुश है, मेरे हिंदू भाइयों और बहनों को जश्न मनाने के लिए दिया जलाना चाहिए." अदालत का फैसला आने के बाद हिंदू पक्ष के वकील विष्णु शंकर जैन ने कहा कि कोर्ट ने हमारी बहस को मान लिया है. आज का दिन ज्ञानवापी मंदिर के लिए शिलान्यास का दिन है.

The Varanasi court on Monday said that the Hindu petition for worship in Shringar Gauri was maintainable and the five Hindu women's plea seeking right to ...

The next hearing in the matter will be on September 22." A month before the Supreme Court's intervention in the case, the Varanasi civil court had ordered the filming of the Gyanvapi mosque, based on the petition by the Hindu women who claimed that there are idols of Hindu Gods and Goddesses in the Gyanvapi mosque complex. The Supreme Court had ordered that "Keeping the complexity and sensitivity of the matter in view, the civil suit before the civil judge in Varanasi shall be heard before a senior and experienced judicial officer of the UP judicial service."

Gyanvapi Dispute: ज्ञानवापी मामले में दायर वाद सुनवाई योग्‍य है या नहीं इस पर आज वाराणसी जिला ...

ज्ञानवापी-श्रृंगार गौरी विवाद की मेरिट का फैसला अपने हक में आए इसलिए हिन्दू पक्ष की ओर से कई मंदिरों में हनुमान चालीसा का पाठ भी किया गया। हिन्दू पक्ष के वकील विष्णु शंकर जैन ने सोमवार की सुबह कहा कि आज के फैसले में पता चल जाएगा कि आध्यात्मिक और ऐतिहासिक बुक दिखाई जाएंगी की नहीं? -20 मई को सुप्रीम कोर्ट की पीठ ने मामले को सिविल जज की कोर्ट से जिला जज की कोर्ट में स्थानांतरित करने का आदेश दिया था [हिंदी न्यूज़](/) [उत्तर प्रदेश](/uttar-pradesh/)Gyanvapi Dispute: ज्ञानवापी-शृंगार गौरी मामले को कोर्ट ने सुनने लायक माना, मुस्लिम पक्ष की अर्जी खारिज

The Anjuman Intezamia Committee, which represents the Muslim side, will move the Allahabad HC challenging the district court order. | Latest News India.

Earlier, a lower court had ordered a videographic survey of the complex. The district judge had last month reserved the order till September 12 in the communally sensitive matter. The case was listed for next hearing on September 22. Religious heads have issued statements asking for peace to be maintained,” said ADG, Law and Order, Prashant Kumar. The district court in Varanasi on Monday rejected the Anjuman Intezamia Committee's plea challenging Hindu worshippers' request for permission for daily worship of Hindu deities in the Gyanvapi mosque. The Anjuman Intezamia Committee, which represents the Muslim side, will move the Allahabad HC challenging the district court order.

Gyanvapi Masjid verdict : ज्ञानवापी मस्जित विवाद मामले में वाराणसी की जिला अदालत ने सोमवार को ...

बरेली के आला हजरत दरगाह के मौलवी शहाबुद्दीन रजवी ने कहा है कि ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद मामले में वाराणसी के आज के फैसले पर वह कोई प्रतिक्रिया नहीं देंगे। लेकिन कोर्ट के इस फैसले को हाईकोर्ट में चुनौती दी जाएगी और इसे आगे ले जाया जाएगा। मौलवी ने कहा कि मस्जिद को बचाने के लिए मुस्लिम पक्ष कोई कोर-कसर नहीं छोड़ेगा। हिंदू पक्ष के वकील विष्णु जैन ने कहा कि आज कोर्ट ने हमारी सभी दलीलों को मान लिया है। मुस्लिम पक्ष की अर्जी खारिज हो गई है। इस मामले में प्लेसेज ऑफ वर्शिप एक्ट-1991 लागू होने की मुस्लिम पक्ष की दलील को कोर्ट ने खारिज कर दिया है। कोर्ट ने कहा है कि हिंदू पक्ष की अर्जी सुनवाई करने लायक है। इस मामले में अगली सुनवाई 22 सितंबर को होगी। मुस्लिम पक्ष की अर्जी जो आर्डर 7/11 लागू होने की दलील देती है, वह भी खारिज हो गई। Gyanvapi Masjid Case verdict : ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद मामले में वाराणसी की जिला अदालत ने सोमवार को अपना अहम फैसला सुनाया। जिला अदालत के जज एके विश्वेषा ने अपने आदेश में कहा कि श्रृंगार गौरी की पूजा की मांग वाली हिंदू पक्ष की अर्जी सुनवाई करने के लायक है। कोर्ट इस अर्जी पर 22 सितंबर से सुनवाई शुरू करेगा। कोर्ट ने मुस्लिम पक्ष की अर्जी खारिज कर दी। कोर्ट ने कहा कि इस मामले में प्लेसेज ऑफ वर्शिप एक्ट-1991 और ऑर्डर 7/11 लागू नहीं होता। अदालत ने अपना फैसला हिंदू पक्ष के हक में सुनाया। कोर्ट के इस फैसले का जहां हिंदू पक्ष ने स्वागत किया है। वहीं, मुस्लिम पक्ष का कहना है कि जिला अदालत के इस फैसले को वह ऊपरी अदालत में चुनौती देगा। फैसले के बाद दोनों पक्षों ने अपनी प्रतिक्रिया दी है।

The Muslim side had argued that the Hindu devotees' plea to pray before idols on Gyanvapi's outer walls is not maintainable under the Places of Worship Act ...

Now, the court is hearing a petition by five Hindu women seeking daily prayers before the idols on the mosque's outer wall. In 2020, Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee opposed the petition seeking ASI survey of the entire Gyanvapi complex. The petitioner had also pleaded before the court that Hindus should be given permission to rebuild the temple. The petitioner also claimed Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb had destroyed a portion of the Kashi Vishwanath temple in 1669 and built a mosque named Gyanvapi Masjid. Petitioner: The petitioner says that the self-styled Jyotirling of Lord Vishwanath in Kashi (Varanasi in Uttar Pradesh) is in the Gyanvapi complex. The petitioner had sought permission to worship in Gyanvapi complex. In 1998, Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee filed a case at the Allahabad High Court. He added that Ajay Mishra, who was removed by the court as the advocate commissioner, had also filed a report on the survey conducted by him on May 6-7. Madan Mohan Yadav, a lawyer of the Hindu side, had said that the mosque was constructed after demolishing the temple. The Gyanvapi mosque is located close to the Kashi Vishwanath temple. Hindu petitioners have sought permission for daily prayers before the idols on outer walls of the Gyanvapi mosque. The next date of hearing is September 22.

Rejecting the Muslims side's petion, the Varanasi court said that the five Hindu petitioners' plea seeking the right to pray inside the Gyanvapi mosque ...

In an important observation, the top court also said that the process to ascertain the religious character of a place of worship is not barred under the Places of Worship Act of 1991. Earlier, a lower court had ordered a videography survey of the complex. On May 20, the Supreme Court transferred the civil suit filed by Hindu devotees on Gyanvapi mosque from civil judge (senior division) to district judge, Varanasi, saying looking at the complexities and sensitivity of the issue, it is better if a senior judicial officer having an experience of over 25-30 years handles this case. 4 (Anjuman Intezamia) is liable to be dismissed.” Five women had filed the petition seeking permission for daily worship of Hindu deities whose idols are claimed to be located on an outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque. The court said that the suit is maintainable, and the next hearing in the matter is on September 22,” he said. Vishvesh had ruled that the Gyanvapi mosque-Shringar Gauri case is maintainable. The court fixed September 22 as the next date of hearing in the case. Narasimha said it will be better if a district judge handles the case and made it clear that it is not casting any aspersion on the civil judge (senior division) who was earlier dealing with the suit. It held that the suit is maintainable and worth being tried. The original suit has sought the restoration of the ancient Kashi Vishwanath temple at the site where the Gyanvapi mosque currently stands. Vishvesh ordered that it would continue to hear the petition seeking the right to worship deities on the outer wall of the mosque complex located close to the Kashi Vishwanath temple. Merajuddin Siddiqui, the advocate representing the Muslim side, said that they will move the Allahabad High Court against the judgement.

The Court dismissed a plea of Anjuman Islamia Masjid committee challenging the maintainability of the suit filed by five Hindu women seeking worshipping ...

The Varanasi district court on Monday upheld the maintainability of the Hindu side's suit in the Gyanvapi mosque complex case.

The court said that the civil suit seeking permission to worship on the mosque premises is liable to be heard on merits. The Varanasi District Court has held that the suit filed by the Hindu parties claiming their right to worship is liable to be heard on merits. the mosque committee, that challenged the maintainability of the suit filed by Hindu worshippers is liable to be dismissed. The Varanasi district court held that the application filed by the defendants, i.e. the mosque committee, failed to prove that the suit of the plaintiffs is barred by the Uttar Pradesh Sri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, 1983. The Varanasi district court has ruled in favour of the parties of the Hindu side on aspects of the maintainability of the Shringar Gauri Gyanvapi Masjid case.

Gyanvapi mosque case: Owaisi said that when the judgement on Babri Masjid was given, he had warned everyone that this will create problems in the country as ...

The next hearing of the case is on September 22," said advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi mosque case. The committee will move the Allahabad HC challenging the district court order. He said with this ruling, the very purpose of the Places of Worship Act 1991 would fail. "There should be an appeal in high court against this order. "A destabilising effect will start after this. Gyanvapi mosque case: Owaisi said that when the judgement on Babri Masjid was given, he had warned everyone that this will create problems in the country as it was passed on the basis of faith.

Gyanvapi Case: वाराणसी जिला अदालत ने ज्ञानवापी केस को सुनने पर सहमति दे दी है. कोर्ट ने कहा कि ...

उन्होंने कहा कि आज के फैसले को लीगल टीम स्टडी करेगी और उसके बाद ही कोई अपनी राय रखी जा सकती है. अदालत ने कहा कि ज्ञानवापी केस सुनने लायक है और मुस्लिम पक्ष की याचिका खारिज कर दी गई है. यहां ये भी जान लीजिए कि अब मुस्लिम पक्ष ने हाई कोर्ट जाने का फैसला लिया है.

ज्ञानवापी मामले में सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश के बाद वाराणसी के जिला जज ने बेहद अहम फैसला ...

[India News](https://www.amarujala.com/india-news) in Hindi related to live update of politics, sports, entertainment, technology and education etc. [Hindi News apps](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.org.AmarUjala.news), iOS [Hindi News apps](https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/amar-ujala-hindi-news/id1028364855) और [Amarujala Hindi News apps](https://www.amarujala.com/amar-ujala-app-download?utm_source=storypromo&utm_campaign=Storyappdownload) अपने मोबाइल पे एके विश्वेश ने मुस्लिम पक्ष की अपील खारिज कर दी। वहीं, एआईएमआईएम पार्टी के प्रमुख असदुद्दीन ओवैसी ने अदालत के फैसले से असहमति जताई है। उन्होंने कहा कि बाबरी मस्जिद मामले के रास्ते पर ही ज्ञानवापी मामले को ले जाया जा रहा है। साथ ही उन्होंने दावा किया कि अब उपासना अधिनियम 1991का कोई मतलब नहीं रह गया है।

Gyanvapi Masjid Verdict: ओवैसी ने कहा कि आज के आदेश के बाद अब इस तरह के लिटिगेशन आने लगेंगे और 15 ...

एआईएमआईएम प्रमुख ओवैसी ने कोर्ट के इस फैसले के बाद प्रधानमंत्री मोदी का जिक्र करते हुए कहा कि पीएम मोदी ने वाराणसी में काशी विश्वनाथ कॉरिडोर का इनॉगेरेशन किया था तब प्लॉट नंबर 93 और 94 को एक्सचेंज किया गया था. जिला अदालत के इस फैसले को लेकर AIMIM प्रमुख असदुद्दीन ओवैसी (Asaduddin Owaisi) ने अपनी प्रतिक्रिया देते हुए कहा कि इस मामले में अपील होनी चाहिए. Asaduddin Owaisi Reaction: वाराणसी की जिला अदालत (Varanasi District Court) ने सोमवार को ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी में नियमित दर्शन और पूजा करने के मामले की सुनवाई करते हुए एक बड़ा फैसला सुनाया.

The Varanasi court ruled that the plea of five Hindu women seeking permission for daily worship of Hindu deities in Shringar Gauri-Gyanvapi is maintainable.

Murugha Shri's lawyer is likely to request the court on Tuesday to shift him to Jayadeva Hospital in Bengaluru for further treatment due to a heart-related ailment. Maval Mulshi sub-divisional officer Sandesh Shirke confirmed that the first compensation of Rs5.65 crore has been given to the Urse farmer for acquiring 2.05 acre of land. They also chopped one Izhar, a resident of Tent Wali Gali in Shahzada Bagh's hair off with a pair of scissors to “teach him a lesson”, police said. Earlier, a lower had ordered a videography survey of the complex. Chief minister Basavaraj Bommai on Monday said the audio involving the BJP MLA will be examined and if something wrong was found, he would get it investigated, as reported by PTI. Senior advocates Hari Shankar Jain, Vishnu Shankar Jain Sudhir Tripathi and others are the counsel for the Hindu side. I am sure that people from the other community will take it sportingly,” said Rekha Pathak, one of the five plaintiffs in the Shringar Gauri complex-Gyanvapi mosque case. Madan Mohan Yadav, a lawyer representing the Hindu side, had argued that the mosque was constructed after demolishing the temple. The court fixed September 22 as the next date of hearing. The case is being heard by the district court following an apex court order. Touhid Khan, who represented AIMC in the district court, said they will file an appeal. It will hear the case next on September 22

वाराणसी के श्रृंगार गौरी-ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद मामले में जिला जज अजय कृष्ण विश्वेश की ...

कोर्ट ने मुस्लिम पक्ष की दलील को खारिज करते हुए अपने फैसले में कहा है कि सिविल प्रक्रिया संहिता के आदेश 07 नियम 11 के तहत इस मामले में सुनवाई हो सकती है. नागरिक प्रक्रिया संहिता सीपीसी के आदेश 7 नियम 11 के तहत ये केस सुनने योग्य है या नहीं, इसी पर कोर्ट में सुनवाई चल रही थी. वाराणसी एसीपी संतोष कुमार सिंह ने बताया कि वाराणसी में 2000 से ज्यादा पुलिसकर्मी तैनात किए गए हैं. सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेश के बाद 23 मई से जिला कोर्ट में सुनवाई चल रही है. कोर्ट परिसर में करीब 250 पुलिसकर्मी तैनात किए गए हैं. जिले के सीमावर्ती इलाकों, होटलों और गेस्ट हाउसों में चेकिंग तेज कर दी गई है. कोर्ट ने अपने फैसले में कहा है कि सिविल प्रक्रिया संहिता के आदेश 07 नियम 11 के तहत इस मामले में सुनवाई हो सकती है. उधर, हिंदू पक्ष भी कोर्ट रूम पहुंच गया है. सुरक्षा को देखते हुए कमिश्नर ने पैदल मार्च किया है. वकील विष्णु जैन और हरिशंकर जैन भी कोर्ट में मौजूद हैं. अगली सुनवाई 22 सितंबर को है. हिंदू पक्ष के वकील विष्णु शंकर जैन ने कहा, कोर्ट ने हमारी बहस को मान लिया है.

ऑल इंडिया मुस्लिम पर्सनल बोर्ड के महासचिव मौलाना खालिद सैफुल्लाह रहमानी ने कहा कि ...

[India News](https://www.amarujala.com/india-news) in Hindi related to live update of politics, sports, entertainment, technology and education etc. Stay updated with us for all breaking news from India News and more [news in Hindi](https://www.amarujala.com/). [Hindi News App](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.org.AmarUjala.news), iOS [Hindi News App](https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/amar-ujala-hindi-news/id1028364855) और [Amarujala Hindi News APP](https://www.amarujala.com/amar-ujala-app-download?utm_source=storypromo&utm_campaign=Storyappdownload) अपने मोबाइल पे

The Varanasi district court on Monday rejected the plea questioning the maintainability of a petition seeking permission for daily worship of Hindu deities ...

More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. The Hindu women had petitioned a Varanasi civil court in August 2021. Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. It also objected to the video being leaked. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed. Union Minister of State for Consumer Affairs Ashwini Kumar Choubey said, "Kashi and Mathura are the pride of our Sanatan Dharma. This decision is for the uplift of our culture." The Vishva Hindu Parishad too hailed it. Already, they are allowed to offer prayers there once a year, their lawyers had argued. The 1991 law made an exemption only for the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute.

Uttar Pradesh Deputy CM Brajesh Pathak, Union Minister Giriraj Singh, Madhya Pradesh CM Shivraj Singh Chauhan hail decision.

“While pronouncing the final judgement in the Babri mosque case, the Supreme Court had termed the Places of Worship Act as an important part of the judgement. When the judgement on Babri Masjid was given, I warned everyone that this will create problems in the country as this judgement was given on basis of faith,” he adds. The lone Muslim face in the State Cabinet, Minister of State in Ministry of Minority Welfare Danish Azad Ansari, said that everyone should respect the verdict of the court and adhere to it. We're going on the same path as that of the Babri Masjid issue. I believe that after this order, the purpose of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, will fail,” said Mr. “It is their right, but we will respect the verdict and strengthen the law and order situation in the State,” he added.

Gyanvapi Case Verdict: ज्ञानवापी मामले में कोर्ट के आदेश पर भाजपा नेता बोले- सत्य की हुई जीत, ओवैसी ...

- # हिंदू पक्ष द्वारा दायर मुकदमे को विचारणीय घोषित करने वाला वाराणसी की अदालत का फैसला महादेव की कृपा के कारण है! सत्य कुमार ने इसे 'सत्य की जीत' करार दिया। वहीं असदुद्दीन ओवैसी ने फैसले पर अप्रसन्नता जाहिर की।

District court Monday ruled on maintainability of suit demanding right to worship idols allegedly located in 'old temple complex' in Gyanvapi Mosque.

The mosque had claimed that the Gyanvapi Mosque is a Waqf property under the Waqf Act, 1995 and that the plaintiffs have no right to worship there. Therefore, it had asserted that no such right to worship existed within the mosque premises. They asserted that they are only demanding the right to worship the deities. The plaintiffs in the case had asserted that they have a right to worship there and that the defendants, including the mosque management committee, should be restrained from interfering with the worship, aarti and bhog. In its order, the court had directed the district judge to decide, on a priority basis, the maintainability application filed by the mosque management committee. Filed in August last year, the petition demands permission to worship idols of the deities Maa Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesh, Lord Hanuman, and Nandi that are allegedly located inside the mosque, within an “old temple complex”.

The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee (AIMC) said a committee of lawyers will study the district court's judgment and accordingly challenge it in the high ...

The madrasa, in village Gujar Tola along the Tanda-Banda national highway, in Gauriganj area, was demolished at around 5am in the presence of a large contingent of police. The iodine level in salt has been found less than the prescribed standard in several districts of the state by the State Health Institute. The Dalit girl who was allegedly gang-raped and set on fire in Pilibhit district recently has been sent to King George's Medical University in Lucknow for further treatment, said superintendent of police Dinesh Kumar Prabhu on Monday. LUCKNOW The MP/MLA court on Monday rejected the bail application of the Chitrakoot-based woman who had named former cabinet minister Gayatri Prajapati in a gang-rape case. Following the ruling, there were celebrations in some pockets with locals playing the dhol (drums), distributing sweets and bursting firecrackers. Varanasi district judge A K Vishvesh agreed to hear the petition filed by five Hindu women who sought permission to worship daily what they claim are idols of Hindu deities located on an outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque.

Muslim petitioners involved in the Gyanvapi mosque case said on Monday that they will consider approaching the Allahabad High Court with their request to ...

“Our country is a multicultural bouquet of all religions and spiritualities. Following the ruing, there were celebrations in some pockets with locals playing the dhol (drums), distributing sweets and bursting firecrackers. “It’s our tradition to seek blessings of the Almighty before any big day. “They are fighting for us, and for this, they deserve felicitation,” Sudha Mishra, a local resident in Maidagin locality, said as he showered flower petals on the plaintiffs. Varanasi district judge A K Vishvesh agreed to hear the petition filed by five Hindu women who sought permission to worship daily what they claim are idols of Hindu deities located on an outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque. “There is always an option to move the high court.

The District Judge rejected the Muslim side's arguments based on three Acts to rule that the civil suits seeking the right to worship Hindu deities on the ...

The court cited Section 4 (9) of the Act, which defines “Temple”, to hold that it does not bar the mosque premises. First, that it is published in the Varanasi gazette that the mosque is built on Wakf land; and second, that the Allahabad High Court has held that land that is used from time immemorial for a religious purpose, such as for a mosque or Muslim burials, would be dedicated to God almighty, and would be treated as Wakf. First, it relied on rulings which held it could “never have been the intention of the legislature to cast a cloud on the right, title or interest of persons who are not Muslims”. “But the ascertainment of a religious character of a place, as a processual instrument, may not necessarily fall foul of the provisions of Sections 3 and 4 (of the Act)… is pending before any court, tribunal or other authority, the same shall abate, and no suit, appeal or other proceeding with respect to any such matter shall lie on or after such commencement in any court, tribunal or other authority”. [ allowed a video survey of the mosque](https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/kashi-vishwanath-gyanvapi-case-video-survey-security-7916471/) where a Shivling was said to have been found in the wazukhana.

Having ruled that Hindu petitioners' right to pray suit is maintainable, the district court will now formulate the issues it wants to decide on & hear ...

In response, the Hindu Sena [ moved](https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/places-of-worship-act-not-applicable-to-gyanvapi-mosque-hindu-sena-president-approaches-supreme-court-against-masjid-committees-plea-199276) the court claiming that the 1991 law doesn’t apply to Gyanvapi mosque because the Kashi Vishwanath temple and Shringar Gauri temple within the mosque complex fall under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. The apex court, however, said that it will await the district judge’s decision on the maintainability application, and The survey of the mosque began on 6 May. A day later, the court ordered videography of the survey. On 16 May, the judge promptly directed the Varanasi district magistrate to seal the place where the Shiva Linga had been reportedly found. In fact, the court has already posted the suit on 22 September for filing of written statement and framing of issues. Vishvesha ruled that the suit is not barred by the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 — a law that forbids alteration of the religious character of a place of worship from what it was on 15 August 1947. Therefore, all matters, including that pertaining to Gyanvapi, would continue to be heard in the courts across the country. Narasimha Rao government in September 1991 — a year before the Babri Masjid was demolished — and has been controversial since then. It also says that any court proceeding regarding any such conversion would cease after the Act comes into force. The rule says that a plea will be rejected if the relief claimed is barred by law. In its order, the court ruled that the argument “does not hold much water” because the plaintiffs want only the right to worship at the disputed property and are not claiming any ownership over the mosque.

Gyanvapi Masjid Verdict: ज्ञानवापी श्रृंगार गौरी केस में वाराणसी के जिला अदालत ने सोमवार को अपना ...

अगली सुनवाई के लिए 22 सितंबर की तारीख तय हुई है.अदालत द्वारा मुस्लिम पक्ष की याचिका खारिज किए जाने के बाद मुस्लिम पक्ष अब हाईकोर्ट जाएगा. वहीं कोर्ट के फैसले के बाद साफ हो गया है कि अब हिंदू पक्ष के पूजा के अधिकार मांगने के मुकदमे पर सुनवाई होगी. कोर्ट के फैसले की आड़ में पीएफआई भारत में अशांति फैलाने वाले अपने एजेंडे को आगे बढ़ाने में फिर से जुट गया है.

Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) [India], September 13 (ANI): All India Muslim Personal Law Board on Monday said that the Varanasi court order given in the Gyanvapi ...

Following this, a local Varanasi court ordered a videography survey of the complex in May. Following this, a Varanasi court ordered the survey of the mosque complex. The next hearing of the case is on September 22,” said Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi mosque case.

Gyanvapi Mosque Case: ऑल इंडिया मुस्लिम पर्सनल लॉ बोर्ड ने ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद श्रृंगार गौरी ...

रहमानी ने कहा, ''अब यह दुखद दौर आ गया है जहां अदालत ने शुरुआत में हिंदू समूह के दावे को स्वीकार कर लिया और उनके लिए मार्ग प्रशस्त कर दिया है. इसके बाद सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बाबरी मस्जिद के फैसले में पूजा स्थल कानून की पुष्टि की थी और इसे अनिवार्य घोषित किया था. अदालत (Court) ने सोमवार को कहा कि वह हिंदू देवी-देवताओं की दैनिक पूजा की मांग वाली याचिका पर सुनवाई जारी रखेगी, जिनकी मूर्तियां ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद की बाहरी दीवार पर हैं.

Gyanvapi Masjid Cases Verdict Highlights: ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद और श्रृंगार गौरी मामले पर वाराणसी की जिला ...

हिंदू पक्ष ने ये भी मांग की है कि ज्ञानवापी में मुसलमानों की एंट्री बंद होनी चाहिए और मस्जिद के गुंबद को ध्वस्त करने का आदेश दिया जाना चाहिए. ये भी दावा किया कि मुस्लिम पक्ष के वकील ने ज्ञानवापी को वक्फ की संपत्ति बताते हुए जो दस्तावेज प्रस्तुत किया है वह असल में बिंदु माधव का धरहरा स्थित आलमगीर मस्जिद का दस्तावेज है. हिंदू पक्ष के वकील मदन मोहन यादव ने बताया कि उन्होंने अपनी दलील में कहा है कि ज्ञानवापी कहीं से मस्जिद नहीं बल्कि मंदिर का ही हिस्सा है इसलिए इस मामले में 1991 का उपासना स्थरल अधिनियम किसी भी तरह से लागू नहीं होता. एक ओर हिंदू पक्ष को अपने पक्ष में फैसला आने की उम्मीद है. हिंदू पक्ष के वकील विष्णु शंकर जैन ने कहा कि आज के फैसले में पता चल जाएगा कि आध्यात्मिक और ऐतिहासिक बुक दिखाई जाएंगी की नहीं? कोर्ट ने ज्ञानवापी मामले पर फैसला सुनाते हुए मुस्लिम पक्ष की दलील को खारिज कर दिया है. कोर्ट का हिंदू पक्ष में फैसला सुनाने के बाद इलाके में खुशी की लहर दोड़ उठी है. अगर फैसला हमारे पक्ष में नहीं आता तो भी हम हार नहीं मानेंगे और आगे देखेंगे कि क्या कुछ किया जा सकता है. अब से कुछ देर में ज्ञानवापी मामले पर एक अहम फैसला आने वाला है. लोगों का कहना है कि, "फैसला हमारे पक्ष में ही आएगा. ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद मामले में याचिकाकर्ता सोहन लाल आर्य ने कहा कि, "यह हिंदू समुदाय की जीत है. केंद्रीय मंत्री गिरिराज सिंह ने कहा कि हम फैसले का सम्मान करते हैं, हम ज्ञानवापी का भी सम्मान करते हैं.

District Judge AK Vishvesh delivered the verdict in the Gyanvapi Shrinagar Gauri dispute case and posted the matter for further hearing on September 22.

More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. [Varanasi](/topic/varanasi) court ordered the survey of the mosque complex. Notably, Section 3 of the Worship Act 1991 bars the conversion of places of worship. It also directed the deployment of the CRPF to protect the sealed area and prohibited people from entering it. The next hearing of the case is on September 22," said Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi mosque case. "It's a win for the Hindu community.

The Varanasi court delivered a key order in the maintainability of the plea filed by the Hindu side in the Gyanvapi Masjid dispute case.

The top court said it will wait for the Varanasi district court's order and adjourned the case to October 20. The masjid administration, however, said that the structure is a fountain, not a shivling. Five women had filed the petition seeking permission for daily worship of Hindu deities whose idols are claimed to be located on an outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque.

PFI President Oma Salam called upon the Anjuman Islamia Masjid Committee to protect the disputed Gyanvapi mosque from being reclaimed by Hindus.

But we will never lose a Masjid again in front of the 19-20-year-olds. Then the aim of the 1991 Places of Religious Worship Act will be defeated. In May this year, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi called upon Muslims to not lose the disputed Gyanvapi mosque at any cost. “When I was 19-21, the Babri Masjid was snatched away from me. Now it appears that more such litigations will be coming and this is going the way the Babri Masjid legal issue went.” He claimed that the order by the Varanasi district court will ‘set off many things’. “A Momin is someone who doesn’t get bitten by the same snake twice. With an intent to create unrest in the country, PFI accused the court of encouraging supposed ‘fascist attacks’ against the country’s minorities. The 1991 Act was made so that such conflicts end.” PFI President Oma Salam extended his support to the Anjuman Islamia Masjid Committee, which challenged the maintainability of the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri suit filed by five Hindu women. While hinting at the possibility of Muslim mobs going berserk, AIMPLB said that the verdict will affect India’s unity and communal harmony. “The government should implement the 1991 law with full force.

Gyanvapi Case Update ज्ञानवापी मामले में जिला जज डा. अजय कृष्ण विश्वेश की अदालत ने सोमवार को यह ...

अजय कृष्ण विश्वेश की अदालत ने सोमवार को यह आदेश देते हुए प्रतिवादी (मस्जिद पक्ष) अंजुमन इंतेजामिया मसाजिद की ओर से दाखिल मुकदमे का प्रार्थना पत्र खारिज कर दिया। 10 सवालों के जवाब से जानिए सब कुछ Gyanvapi Case पर फैसले के बाद अब आगे क्या?

VHP, the hardline affiliate of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has been spearheading a campaign for reclaiming the mosque next to the Kashi Vishwanath ...

The leader underlined no resolutions have been passed for the construction of a Krishna Temple or allowing prayers in Gyanvapi. A BJP leader, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the party believes the issue should be resolved in a court of law. This is a religious and spiritual matter therefore, the decision should be accepted with grace and calmness and not be interpreted in terms of victory or defeat,” Kumar said. Kumar earlier stressed the Places of Worship Act does not apply to Gyanvapi as the discovery of a ‘Shivling’ showed the structure was a temple even before the law came into being. The first hurdle has been crossed and now the court will hear the matter on its own merits,” VHP’s international working president Alok Kumar said on Monday. “The Varanasi court has now decided that the Varanasi suit is not injuncted by the Places of Worship (special provisions) Act of 1991.

On Monday, a Varanasi court dismissed the plea by the Anjuman Islamia Masjid committee challenging the maintainability of suit filed by Hindu women seeking ...

[AIMPLB](/topic/aimplb)), on Monday said that the Varanasi court's order in the [Gyanvapi](/topic/gyanvapi)Shrinagar Gauri dispute is very 'disappointing and painful'. The [Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee](/topic/anjuman-intezamia-masjid-committee)had claimed that the Gyanvapi mosque is a Waqf property and raised questions on the maintainability of the plea. [Anjuman Islamia Masjid](/topic/anjuman-islamia-masjid)committee challenging the maintainability of suit filed by Hindu women seeking rights to worship inside the Gyanvapi masjid compound.

A plea by five Hindu women seeking the right to pray daily to idols installed inside the Gyanvapi Masjid complex in Varanasi is not barred under existing ...

The court said that it placed no bar on the worship of idols placed within the “endowments” of the temple complex. “It is clear that no bar has been imposed by the Act regarding a suit claiming right to worship idols installed in the endowment within the premises of the temple, or outside. The court also held that the suit didn’t attempt to change the religious character of the place as it only dealt with the right to worship. Monday’s decision clears the decks for the case of the Hindu women to be heard. The law, passed against the backdrop of the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute, locks the position or “religious identity” of any place of worship as it existed on August 15, 1947, and the Muslim side said it barred any legal attempt to reclaim title or other rights at the complex. But the court sided with the Hindu petitioners, who said that devotees were allowed to worship the idols between 1947 and 1993, when the state government abruptly restricted access and only allowed them to offer prayers on the fourth day of the Chaitra month. The court clamped a security cordon around the entire complex even as the Muslim side argued that the structure found was a ceremonial ablution fountain. Though the order on Monday only decided on the preliminary issue of maintainability of the petition, it sparked celebrations among Hindu groups. The top court, however, refused to interfere with the case or entertain the petitions challenging the survey. Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, 1983 and the application 35C filed by the defendant no.4 is liable to be dismissed,” said the judge in a 26-page order. I am sure that people from the other community will take it sportingly,” said Rekha Pathak, one of the five petitioners. “The plaintiffs are claiming only right to worship at disputed property,” it added.

मुस्लिम पक्ष ने तीन कानून को आधार बनाकर कोर्ट से अपील की थी वो हिंदू पक्ष की अपील खारिज ...

मुस्लिम पक्ष ने अदालत के इस फैसले को उच्च न्यायालय में चुनौती देने की घोषणा की है. विश्वेश ने अंजुमन इंतेजामिया मस्जिद समिति की याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें मामले की विचारणीयता पर सवाल उठाया गया था. मुस्लिम पक्ष ने इस कानून को आधार मानकर वाराणसी जिला जज से हिंदू महिलाओं महिलाओं की अपील खारिज करने की अपील की. उत्तर प्रदेश में वाराणसी की जिला अदालत ने सोमवार को ज्ञानवापी शृंगार गौरी मामले की विचारणीयता पर सवाल उठाने वाली मुस्लिम पक्ष की याचिका खारिज कर दी और कहा कि वह देवी-देवताओं की दैनिक पूजा के अधिकार के अनुरोध वाली याचिका पर सुनवाई जारी रखेगी, जिनके विग्रह ज्ञानवापी मस्जिद की बाहरी दीवार पर स्थित हैं. मुस्लिम पक्ष ने तीन कानून को आधार बनाकर कोर्ट से अपील की थी वो हिंदू पक्ष की अपील खारिज कर दे. कोर्ट ने पूरी दलील सुनकर कहा कि किसी भी तरह मुस्लिम पक्ष सफल नहीं हुआ जिससे ये साबित हो कि ये एक्ट हिंदू महिलाओं की अपील को खारिज करने का आधार है.

Gyanvapi Case: वाराणसी कोर्ट के फैसले पर भड़कीं महबूबा मुफ्ती, क्या कुछ बोलीं? महबूबा मुफ्ती ( ...

दरअसल, ज्ञानवापी केस पर वाराणसी जिला अदालत (Varanasi District Court) ने हिंदू पक्ष के हक में फैसला सुनाते हुए मुस्लिम पक्ष की अर्जी को खारिज कर दी है. इसके बाद सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बाबरी मस्जिद के फैसले में पूजा स्थल कानून की पुष्टि की थी और इसे अनिवार्य घोषित किया था. वहीं कोर्ट के फैसले के बाद जम्मू-कश्मीर की पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री महबूबा मुफ्ती के बयान ने नया बखेड़ा खड़ा कर दिया है.