Need no introduction, one of the great servants of Indian cricket, Ashwin is a master of a spinner to have in any team. In red ball cricket, his class is of the ...
It was a lost cause anyways and the team management decided to utilize his skills in that match. In red ball cricket, his class is of the top level. Need no introduction, one of the great servants of Indian cricket, Ashwin is a master of a spinner to have in any team.
The Deepti Sharma-Charlotte Dean continues to dominate news headlines across the world as far the cricket fraternity is concerned with many pitching in with ...
She would have lived the rest of her life with that," he concluded. He referred to the current actions of a bowler's revolution. "Nobody goes to Charlie Dean and asks her, 'Why did you leave the crease?' They never ask the non-striker why they leave the crease early. "Only a certain section of people seem to have a problem with this. While Deepti's actions were completely legal and within the rules, a lot of English cricketers have stated it was against the spirit of cricket. A lot of senior England men's team players such as James Anderson, Stuart Broad, Jos Buttler and Ben Stokes expressed dismay at it alongside the English media as they claimed it was against the 'spirit of cricket.'
Ashwin came in support of Deepti Sharma following her decision to run Charlotte Dean out at the non-striker's end during the third ODI of the series against ...
Also get updates on [Indian Cricket Team](https://www.hindustantimes.com/topic/indian-cricket-team)and [Cricket Live Score](https://www.hindustantimes.com/topic/live-score)of ongoing matches. She would have lived the rest of her life with that," he concluded. "Only a certain section of people seem to have a problem with this. Many were critical of the pitch back then, but Ashwin believes that it is a part of “controlling the narratives.” The dismissal caused controversy in the English cricket fraternity with many criticising Deepti for the decision to use the dismissal, despite it being within the rules of the game. Earlier this week, the off-spinner opened on the issue in a YouTube video where he talked in detail about the Deepti-Dean controversy that has grappled the world cricket ever since.
The Charlie Dean's run-out by Deepti Sharma during the third and final Women's ODI between India and England has triggered a lot of buzz in the cricket ...
Likewise, a non-striker should also know that he can be dismissed run-out legitimately if they keep stepping out of the crease and taking that extra yard,” explained Ashwin. Because in today’s world of competitive cricket, I spoke about this during the Ahmedabad Test match when the pitch issue’ was brought up on what was a good pitch. Just like how a batter knows when he steps out of the crease against a spinner or a pacer that a wicketkeeper can dismiss them by stumping. Because a certain section of people consciously chooses to instil in others how they should think about a certain thing. Many of them have started asking why you are asking questions to the innocent instead of asking the person who should be guilty. Now, Indian off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has also joined the bandwagon, stating that certain people who have problems with the non-striker’s run-out tend to play the victim card.
Ravichandran Ashwin spoke in detail about the debate over running out the non-striker following Deepti Sharma's dismissal of Charlie Dean.
Like us on [Android](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.robo.ndtv.cricket&hl=en)or [iOS](https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/ndtv-cricket/id418320331?mt=8). If the captain had withdrawn the appeal at that time just because of the boos from the crowd, it would have been a stigma for Deepti Sharma, the bowler, the cricketer and the person," he concluded. Likewise, a non-striker should also know that he can be dismissed run-out legitimately if they keep stepping out of the crease and taking that extra yard." They never ask the non-striker why they leave the crease early. [Ravichandran Ashwin](https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/players/1109-ravichandran-ashwin-playerprofile), who had also run-out [Jos Buttler](https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/players/1367-jos-buttler-playerprofile) during the 2019 Indian Premier League in the same fashion, on Saturday spoke about the entire incident, saying he sees this particular mode of dismissal as "bowlers revolution". Because a captain backing the player at the moment is very important. But as the game gets more competitive, it's the duty of the non-striker to stay at the crease. Because in today's world of competitive cricket, I spoke about this during the Ahmedabad Test match when the pitch issue' was brought up on what was a good pitch. Just like how a batter knows when he steps out of the crease against a spinner or a pacer that a wicketkeeper can dismiss them by stumping. "In my opinion, they always play the victim card. [Speaking on his YouTube channel](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3od5bpskTI), Ashwin spoke about the subject matter in detail, and before directly speaking about the incident, the off-spinner said: "In the beginning, the whole world saw it that way. [Deepti Sharma](https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/players/107744-deepti-sharma-playerprofile) at the non-striker's end during the Lord's ODI last week is still being talked about, and fans and pundits are still debating whether this particular mode of dismissal is in 'spirit of cricket'.
Though it has been a week since the incident but Deepti Sharma's run-out of Charlotte Dean still continues to be a hot topic in the cricket fraternity.
She would have lived the rest of her life with that," "Nobody goes to Charlie Dean and asks her, 'Why did you leave the crease?' They never ask the non-striker why they leave the crease early. He added: "Only a certain section of people seem to have a problem with this. Many of them have started asking why are you asking questions to the innocent instead of asking the person who should be guilty," Meanwhile, veteran cricketer Ravichandran Ashwin has lashed out at the critics and has come out in support of Deepti Sharma. Well, Deepti Sharma found herself at the receiving end of criticism after she had controversially ‘Mankading’ a set Charlie Dean for the hosts’ 10th wicket to seal the match.
India's right-arm off-spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has given his views on the Deepti Sharma and Charlie Dean run-out controversy. Supporting Deepti's action ...
Likewise, a non-striker should also know that he can be dismissed, run-out legitimately if they keep stepping out of the crease and taking that extra yard." Many of them have started asking why you are asking questions to the innocent instead of asking the person who should be guilty. Supporting [ Deepti's ](https://www.crictracker.com/social-tracker-cricket/harsha-bhogle-hits-out-at-english-media-for-portrayal-of-deepti-sharma-in-run-out-row/)action, Ashwin said that bowlers don't do any crime by running out a batter who is backing too far at the non-striker's end.
Ravichandran Ashwin commented on the controversy regarding running out the non-striker in the aftermath of Deepti Sharma's dismissal of Charlie Dean.
I see this as a bowler’s revolution,” he stated. A non-striker should be aware that if they continue to leave the crease and go an extra yard, they may be lawfully dismissed run-out.” “We should teach the kids right from when they are young on this. Risk Just as a batsman is aware that a wicketkeeper can remove a bowler by stumping when he leaves the crease to face a pacer or a spinner. striker I have already covered enough ground on this subject. But today, the majority of people have begun to see that the bowlers were not guilty of any crimes there.