Haldwani

On December 20, the Uttarakhand High Court directed that a week's notice be given to the encroachers, after which the encroachments should be demolished.

The land belonged to the Railways. Bhati said the people have never claimed their right to rehabilitation, instead they have claimed right over the land itself. The High Court order had come out of the blue and was ex parte. The rights of the families on the land have to be examined. Advocate Vipin Nair, appearing for the original PIL petitioner Ravi Shankar Joshi on whose petition the High Court had passed the direction on December 20, submitted that there was a specific prayer for resettlement and rehabilitation of the affected public before the High Court. Oka remarked that some of these people have been living on the land for 50 to 70 years and cannot be evicted within a week.

Congress, Samajwadi Party, AIMIM have come out in support of the Haldwani protests against the planned eviction according to the high court order.

The BJP is opposing the protest and said a Hindu-Muslim colour has been given. "How does the land belong to the railway? On December 20, 2022, the Uttarakhand high court ordered the removal of the 'encroachment' from the railway land in Haldwani. Samajwadi Party sent a delegation to the Haldwani protest site on Wednesday. [Supreme Court on Thursday heard a bunch of petitions ](https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/supreme-court-stays-haldwani-eviction-asks-for-workable-arrangement-101672904821325.html)in connection with the railway land case for which protests have been going on for the past few days and stayed the planned eviction which was scheduled to begin around January 10. The eviction would have resulted in the demolition of houses, schools, temples, banks, mosques etc against which protests have going on.

The Apex Court has barred any new construction or development on the land. The case has now been listed for its next hearing on 7 February.

Haldwani में Nainital High Court के रेलवे की भूमि में हुए अतिक्रमण हटाए जाने के निर्देश के बाद यह ...

याचिकाकर्ताओं ने दावा किया कि उनके पास वैध दस्तावेज हैं जो स्पष्ट रूप से उनके वैध अधिकार को स्थापित करते हैं. रेलवे के मुताबिक उसकी भूमि पर 4,365 लोगों ने अतिक्रमण किया हुआ है. 5 जनवरी यानी गुरुवार को सुप्रीम कोर्ट में इस मामले में सुनवाई होनी है.

कोर्ट ने कहा कि 7 दिन में अतिक्रमण हटाने का फैसला सही नहीं है. सुनवाई के दौरान जस्टिस संजय ...

हाई कोर्ट ने 20 दिसंबर को रेलवे को निर्देश दिया कि एक हफ्ते का नोटिस देकर भूमि से अवैध अतिक्रमणकारियों को तत्काल हटाया जाए. रेलवे की इस जमीन पर अवैध कब्जा हटाने के विरोध में 4 हजार से ज्यादा परिवार हैं. कोर्ट ने हल्द्वानी के बनभूलपुरा इलाके में रेलवे की जमीन से अतिक्रमण हटाने के हाईकोर्ट के आदेश पर रोक लगा दी है. हल्द्वानी में अनधिकृत कॉलोनियों को हटाने के विरोध में हजारों लोग सड़कों पर उतरकर प्रदर्शन कर रहे हैं. - सुप्रीम कोर्ट में इस मामले में अगली सुनवाई 7 फरवरी को होगी. आरोप है कि हल्द्वानी में करीब 4400 हजार परिवार रेलवे की जमीन पर अतिक्रमण करके रहते हैं.

There is no public good in 'bulldozer urbanism'. Demolitions and evictions that mainly affect the poor irreparably damage already vulnerable lives while ...

First, it is important that the courts recognise their role as protectors of citizens from the arbitrariness of state action – the ways in which it treats different sections of the population. This requires courage and foresight on the part of those in charge of the urban landscape. The difference lies in how those in power deal with the rich and the poor and their understanding of demolitions of poor localities as effective urban planning. These areas eventually transform from being “unauthorised” to “unauthorised regularised” and finally to that most coveted of all the Kafkaesque urban categories of existence, “authorised”. The Birla Committee noted that DIT’s strategy of buying land at cheap rates, “freezing” supplies and then selling to the highest bidder had only exacerbated the problems of housing and access to land. It cumulatively institutionalises the illegality that the state nurtures within it and further develops it as a well-crafted art of governance.

More than 50000 people, mostly Muslims, faced the demolition of their homes which allegedly encroached on railway land.

“I want them to bury me under the wreckage of my house, but I will not leave.” he said. More than 100 homes in the colony belong to them. “Appeals of more than 1000 residents of Banbhulpura were pending before the district magistrate. A government primary school in the colony is reported to be more than 100 years old. Residents say they have been living in the neighbourhood for decades and had the government documents to prove ownership. “If the said demolition happens, I will be left with nothing.

The area covers a 2-km strip of land near the Haldwani railway station - Gafoor Basti, Dholak Basti and Indira Nagar, in Banbhulpura area.

It said the case will be heard again next month. "There cannot be uprooting of 50,000 people overnight... The court also stopped any construction in the area and sought responses from the railways and the Uttarakhand government.

Haldwani demolition news: The top court stated that a solution needs to worked out keeping in view the people who face the threat of eviction from the ...

[IEX, Dixon, Tanla Platforms: 31 well-known midcaps fell over 25% in 2022. The court furthermore noted any cost recovery should be made from encroachers who do not vacate the land despite a week’s notice by the Railways and local authorities. Those facing the threat of eviction have been living there for decades. Supreme Court’s Justice SK Kaul noted, “There is a human angle to the problem, these are people. 50,000 people cannot be evicted overnight.” The top court stated that a solution needs to be worked out keeping in view the people who face the threat of eviction from the railway land in Haldwani’s Banbhoolpura area.

रेलवे प्रकरण को लेकर लाइन नंबर 17 में दुआ करते लोग - फोटो : अमर उजाला. ...

हल्द्वानी में रेलवे की जमीन पर बसी वनभूलपुरा बस्ती को खाली कराने के मामले में आक्रोश ...

Supreme Court: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने हल्द्वानी के बनभूलपुरा इलाके में रेलवे की जमीन से अतिक्रमण ...

भाजपा इस विरोध का विरोध कर रही है और कह रही है कि इसे हिंदू-मुस्लिम रंग दिया गया है. Supreme Court: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने हल्द्वानी के बनभूलपुरा इलाके में रेलवे की जमीन से अतिक्रमण हटाने के हाईकोर्ट के आदेश पर रोक लगा दी है. 20 दिसंबर 2022 को उत्तराखंड हाई कोर्ट ने हल्द्वानी में रेलवे की जमीन से 'अतिक्रमण' हटाने का आदेश दिया. मुरादाबाद के सांसद एसटी हसन ने प्रतिनिधिमंडल का नेतृत्व करते हुए कहा, "जमीन रेलवे की कैसे है? प्रदर्शनकारियों के अनुसार, जमीन रेलवे की नहीं है. साथ ही बता दें कि बुधवार को उत्तराखंड के पूर्व मुख्यमंत्री हरीश रावत ने नियोजित विध्वंस के खिलाफ देहरादून में अपने घर पर एक घंटे का मौन विरोध प्रदर्शन किया.

SC on Haldwani Encroachment Removal रेलवे की 29 एकड़ जमीन से अतिक्रमण हटाने के हाईकोर्ट के फैसले पर ...

- SC में निवासियों द्वारा दाखिल अर्जी में कहा गया था कि उच्च न्यायालय ने विवादित आदेश पारित करने में गंभीर गलती की है। याचिका में कहा गया था कि याचिकाकर्ताओं सहित कई लोगों के मामले जिला मजिस्ट्रेट के समक्ष अभी तक लंबित हैं। - उत्तराखंड के सीएम पुष्कर सिंह धामी ने फैसला आने पर कहा कि वे इस बात पर कायम है कि यह रेलवे की जमीन है। धामी ने कहा कि हम कोर्ट के आदेश के अनुसार आगे बढ़ेंगे। नई दिल्ली, आनलाइन डेस्क। उत्तराखंड के हल्द्वानी में बनभूलपुरा व गफूर बस्ती में बुलडोजर चलाने पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने रोक लगा दी है। रेलवे की 29 एकड़ जमीन से अतिक्रमण हटाने के हाईकोर्ट के फैसले पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट अभी और सुनवाई करेगा। रेलवे ने इस जमीन पर 50000 लोगों द्वारा कब्जा करने की बात कही है। उन्होंने इसी को लेकर हाईकोर्ट का रुख किया था, जहां जमीन से कब्जा हटाने की बात कही गई थी। सुनवाई के दौरान आज शीर्ष न्यायालय ने मानवीय एंगल को देखते हुए फिलहाल बुलडोजर न चलाने का आदेश दिया है। अब मामले में अगली सुनवाई 7 फरवरी को होगी। कोर्ट द्वारा कई बाते इस सुनवाई में कही गई, आइए जानें मामले से जुड़ी 10 बड़ी बातें..

Most encroachments are in the approaches of railway stations in Metros and other big cities in the form of slums along tracks, according to Centre.

As of now, the Supreme Court has stayed further demolitions. In November 2022, the Nogaon district administration in Assam demolished over a hundred houses on both sides of railway tracks. Even after eviction, occupants returned to the land. About a year ago, the Supreme Court said that the railways was also responsible for ensuring there was no encroachment on its land. About 814 hectares of railway land was under encroachment, the central government had said last year. “For old encroachments, where people are not amenable to persuasion, action is taken under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PPE Act, 1971).

दरअसल, बीती 20 दिसंबर को उत्तराखंड हाईकोर्ट ने हल्द्वानी में रेलवे भूम ...

[India News](https://www.amarujala.com/india-news) in Hindi related to live update of politics, sports, entertainment, technology and education etc. Stay updated with us for all breaking news from India News and more [news in Hindi](https://www.amarujala.com/). [Hindi News App](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.org.AmarUjala.news), iOS [Hindi News App](https://itunes.apple.com/in/app/amar-ujala-hindi-news/id1028364855) और [Amarujala Hindi News APP](https://www.amarujala.com/amar-ujala-app-download?utm_source=storypromo&utm_campaign=Storyappdownload) अपने मोबाइल पे

What is the Haldwani case and how did it reach the courts? What had the Uttarakhand High Court ordered earlier and what has the apex court now observed?

Residents have said they have deeds for the land, and have ben living here for decades. Residents of this land went to the Supreme Court, which in 2017 told the High Court that the residents’ side should be heard too. Its 176-page ruling said: “Owing to the certain most reckoned political shield, which was then being provided by the then ruling party for its political gains to the unauthorised occupants, just to secure its vote bank, the State itself has filed a Review Petition, for no subsisting and valid reasons… The case first went to the High Court in 2013, when one Ravi Shankar Joshi filed a writ petition regarding illegal sand mining in river Gaula, which flows along the Haldwani railway station. Apart from that, there are issues of occupants claiming rights in the land as lessees/auction purchasers. What had the Uttarakhand High Court ordered earlier and what has the apex court now observed?

If the Supreme Court does not order a stay on the Uttarakhand High Court's eviction order, 4500 homes in Haldwani - affecting nearly 50000 lives - are going ...

And let's not forget that these houses have been regularly paying taxes and bills and are now being labeled as illegal encroachments by the courts. Have we as a nation started taking pride in the number of people that we get to disenfranchise and render homeless each year? When it comes to evictions - especially the ones that would make people homeless - an absence of legal title does not mean that a resident is without any rights and can simply be turfed off the land. On January 3, Muslim women in the area staged a protest against the demolition drive. The women of Haldwani gathered peacefully to protest against the HC’s eviction order since it is poised to displace more than 50,000 people. As Uttarakhand’s Haldwani faces demolition, it should baffle any conscientious person as to why no major national media is covering the issue. In 2022, a fresh Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in the Uttarakhand High Court to vacate 78 acres of land. An important point brought out in the SC order is the confusion over the demarcation of railway land and revenue land, as the 29 acres claimed by the railways apparently belong to the state. In 2016, the Uttarakhand High Court ordered a complete evacuation of 29 acres of railway land. A map shared by Tasleem Ansari shows roughly 78 acres of land and the population to be evicted could make up an entire township. Since then, the government has changed and the state is no longer claiming the land, so what is being done is absolutely devious and apocalyptic. Haldwani is burning and its time to call a spade a spade.