Dive into the intriguing world of Supreme Court cases involving Patanjali ads and Election Commission guidelines. Find out about Baba Ramdev's unconditional apology and the challenges to VVPAT verification rules.
In a series of events at the Supreme Court, Baba Ramdev, the yoga guru, submitted an unconditional apology for misleading advertisements by Patanjali, emphasizing their aim to promote healthier living. On the other hand, the Court issued notices to the Election Commission regarding the verification of VVPAT slips in elections, stirring up debates on election transparency and procedures.
The Supreme Court showcased its displeasure as Ramdev's apology was deemed as 'absolute defiance' for not complying with Court orders on Patanjali's ads. Alongside, the petition challenging the sequence of VVPAT verification in elections raised questions on the integrity of the electoral process and the need for comprehensive scrutiny.
On another front, the Court delved into the intricacies of Arbitration Act sections, highlighting the power dynamics between Courts and Arbitral Awards. As the legal analysis unfolds, the Supreme Court's role in maintaining fairness and justice in arbitration disputes comes to the forefront.
Amidst the legal showdowns, the Supreme Court's scrutiny over misleading advertisements and election procedures sheds light on the crucial intersection of law, public interest, and accountability.
Ramdev submitted an unconditional apology to the Supreme Court, clarifying that Patanjali's intention was solely to encourage healthier living among ...
New Delhi: Yoga guru Baba Ramdev on Tuesday issued an unconditional apology to the Supreme Court for not complying with its order in the misleading ...
Baba Ramdev tendered an unconditional apology for violating the Supreme Court's order for misleading advertisements of Patanjali's medicinal products.
The exemption, offered in March 2020, was challenged before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which asked the Ministry in October 2020 to review it within ...
Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail slips from only five randomly selected polling stations in each Assembly segment are currently verified.
The petition challenged the election commission's guidelines that mandates that that VVPAT verification shall be done sequentially, i.e. one after the other ...
The article analyzes Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act and the power of the Courts to modify an Arbitral Award. Legal Scriptures - Abhijit Mittal, ...
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the apology Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev sought to make in a contempt case, arising out of advertisements issued ...
The Supreme Court today issued notice on a petition seeking inter-alia counting of all Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) paper slips in elections, ...
The Supreme Court issued notice to the Election Commission on a plea seeking counting of all Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) paper slips in ...
The Supreme Court summoned Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna over Patanjali's misleading ads claiming to cure diseases, defying court orders.
The Supreme Court's division bench came down heavily on Baba Ramdev and Patanjali Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna for not taking the contempt notices ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuked Patanjali Ayurved over the casual apology it submitted for its failure to stop carrying misleading advertisements.
The Supreme Court's division bench came down heavily on Baba Ramdev and Patanjali Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna for not taking the contempt notices ...